Superman II
1980
1980
Director: Richard Lester
Starring: Christopher Reeve, Gene Hackman, Terrence Stamp,
Margot Kidder, Sarah Douglas, Jackie Cooper, Jack O’Halloran
Rated: PG
So this is planet
Houston.
~General Zod
Before we get started- I WILL indeed be covering the Richard
Donner cut of Superman II. It won’t be discussed until later, as I’m
doing everything in release order.
Today, we are solely focusing on the Richard Lester interpretation and
officially released and official cannon Superman
II.
Of course Superman was
a massive success. So of course there would be a sequel. But wait, there already is, and it’s about
75% done. But wait, there’s a pending
lawsuit over payment with a director from a previous Salkind project. How can we further avoid it? Oh, let’s dump Richard Donner and have him
(Richard Lester) finish the film instead of payment. But, wait!
We need to go back and reshoot a big percentage of the film in order to
give Lester sole credit. Here we go
folks, Superman II!
Within just a few minutes of rejoining the world of
Metropolis in Superman II, there’s a definitely a slight difference. The world is the same, but something is just
a half step off. And it’s quite
obvious. Richard Lester infuses some
very British humor into the already established world of Donner’s film. If you watch a lot of James Bond films from
the late 70s to early 80s, its quite noticeable. Most of it is pretty welcome, but some you
can’t help but groan. While Lester
lightens the mood, the film manages to raise the stakes.
After a terrorist fubar in Paris, Superman tosses a bomb
into space, release our cameo’d Kryptonian prisoners last seen at the beginning
of Superman. The trio, led by General Zod, boasts
Superman’s powers and outnumbers him as well.
Zod is carefree in his terror strike is bound to conquer Earth for
himself no matter what is in the way.
Stamp gives an all-time great performance in a superhero villain role,
due to his complete devotion to commit to the character. If anything, this guy made a huge name for
himself that he’s still living off of to this day.
Meanwhile, we get the genesis of the “I want to quit being
the superhero, only to need my powers back immediately” stories we tend to get
in the sequel to a comic book superhero story (Hello, Spiderman 2). In a smart
turn of events, Lois is convinced Clark Kent is Superman and throws everything
including her life in the mix to prove her point. Due to some clumsiness, Lois discovers her
intuition to be true. So we don’t have
to spend another movie wondering if she’ll find out or he’ll fess up and tell
her. Superman finds being with her more
important than holding up his Earth’s protector duties and has the Fortress of
Solitude remove his powers. About 5
minutes later, he sees the Kryptonians on the news and needs them back. To undo all this with Lois, we get another
stretch of imagination that Superman has the power to kiss someone and have
them forget everything. Spin around the
world to transport through time or kiss and forget. Which do you prefer?
Due to money issues with Brando, he was not brought
back. Instead, he was removed from the
retcon flashback and his presence in Superman’s choice to lose his powers
void. Margot Kidder wasn’t happy about
coming back which would influence Lois’ involvement in the next film. She also looks too skinny, has some bad teeth
and is terrible in the newly filmed sequences compared to herself from the
already filmed material that plays back and forth. The funniest however is not bringing Hackman
back to finish the film. While Sam Raimi
grew up having phone finding Fake Shemps in Three Stooges shorts, I find it
quite funny to find Fake Lex Luthors in Superman II. Having this knowledge, check it out. Its quite humorous the obvious stand ins and
ADR’d imitation voice they use to make due.
It’s not harmful to the film, but being in the know it gives a little
chuckle.
Can I go without mentioning Superman pulling off the
cellophane “S” on his costume?
Absolutely not! It’s always
pretty dumb when they add powers like this AND kissing in the same movie. It really serves less of a purpose than a
punch or Fortress of Solitude booby trap.
It’s the ultimate head scratcher and WTF moment when you see it for the
first time. It makes for a great joke,
but completely dumb in this movie.
Superman II is always a candidate for a sequel being better
than the original. I’m not sure I can
quite go all the way with that just yet.
It compliments the first one greatly and really feels like the 2nd
half of that movie. There are things
this movie does much better. The stakes
are higher and we get a full fledged movie with no long origin story. The villain brings more menace. The action scenes are much bigger and more
spectacular. The fight in the streets of
Metropolis is still quite impressive today.
Narratively, some things just come a bit rush or awkward and I think the
first one nabs a better tone and gets the fun and goofy a little better. As a movie I could pop in, sit back and watch
more often, I’ll give it to Superman II.
The first is crafted a bit better and has the overall “epic film” feeling
though. It’s a hard choice to make. And I’ll have to ultimately make it when I
rank them at the end. So, stay tuned!
Next: SUPERMAN III
No comments:
Post a Comment